For once… and wouldn’t you know?

May 19, 2016 | 4 comments

For a new look at Holmes...

For a new look at Holmes…

Today our Mystery Book Club meets and, for a change, I actually enjoyed the book we will be discussing.  Make that ‘they.’  I doubt that I will make it as I have a last-minute doctor’s appointment twenty minutes beforehand.  IF the doctor isn’t running late and IF there are no other complications, I may make it for the tail end of things.  I hope so.

It’s the first time in ages that I have really liked our book selection for the month and, for once, I have a few positive things to say!  Isn’t that always the way?  I’m pretty sure that my reputation as the ‘curmudgeon’ among the group is probably well-established, and here was my chance to soften my edges a bit.

The book in question is The Beekeeper’s Apprentice, or on the Segregation of the Queen by Laurie R, King.  It was written in 1994, the first in a series of (so far) fourteen, and we chose it in keeping with our group’s policy of ‘reading the first of a series and then you’re on your own.’  Somehow, I had it confused with The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd (which I had read and loved) and so I was fairly enthusiastic about the selection,

Sherlock Holmes

Sherlock Holmes

Then, I learned that this book had to do with Sherlock Holmes and my eagerness drained away all too quickly.  Unlike almost every other person I know, mystery lover or not, I am not a Sherlock Holmes fan – not in books, in movies or on TV.  I find him insufferably arrogant and the plots thin yet convoluted at the same time.  There is nothing compelling about him for me.  So my initial interest waned considerably.

But I persevered.  To my delight and amazement, I found in King’s book a Holmes I rather liked.  He is older, perhaps mellower, and the main protagonist, Mary Russell, sees him in a completely different light from Watson’s view as presented by Arthur Conan Doyle.  Plus, Mary Russell put me in mind of Nancy Drew of my childhood – a quick-witted, no nonsense sort of protagonist.  (Although I do suspect that if I re-read some of those Carolyn Keene books, I would find my memory flawed.)

All-in-all, I enjoyed The Beekeeper’s Apprentice and certainly hope that I arrive at our meeting in time to say so. Will I continue on with the series?  Maybe.  There are glimmers of a romantic Holmes and I’m curious as to how that thread develops.  It’s a side of him I never would have imagined.

4 Comments

  1. Stephanie Frieze

    You have me intrigued, Sydney! I will share this review with our What I’m Reading, What I’ve Read page on Facebook!

    Reply
  2. Jane E Smith

    I have been so disappointed with the last two choices for my Mystery Book Club. I am putting this one on my list for when it is my turn to choose!

    Reply
  3. Jeff Vierra

    An interesting way to use your blog Sydney…as a means to get the first word in when you won’t be on time for the gathering.

    (Ingenious! I’m taking notes.)

    Reply
    • sydney

      Actually, I got to the meeting only ten minutes late — in plenty of time to voice my opinions in person. Only one or two of the folks gathered there had read my blog so they got the pleasure (ahem!) of hearing my opinion first-hand. (Sad to say, not everyone follows my blog — which, of course is wrong, wrong, wrong! lol) Thaks for taking notes though I can’t imagine that they’ll be useful! Love, S.

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *