
The Cannery at Oysterville, circa 1945
I counted seventy-six in the audience at the Planning Commission hearing last night. When all was said and done, it looked as though 73 of us were there to support the endeavors of Dan Driscoll and Oysterville Sea Farms. That left three in opposition.
They are a formidable threesome. Their ‘leader’ mentioned that people have called him a “bully.” I can attest to that. He was called a bully back in the 1940s when he was my classmate at Ocean Park School. I think that “zealot” might be a better term these days. I wondered how many people in the audience have gone head-to-head with him over the years. I certainly have. And now his sights are set upon a member of his own family. Not a pretty picture.
At issue last night was Dan’s retail business – specifically his recent and very successful service of clam chowder and beer and wine on the deck of his business. “Against the zoning laws,” according to the opposition who talked long and loud about protecting the water quality in the bay. Yet they couldn’t be specific about how or why Dan’s business could possibly have a negative impact.
Instead they used terms like “a slippery slope” and talked about the dire aspects of development on the shores of Chesapeake Bay and Puget Sound. To listen to them talk, we in Pacific County are only steps away from a bayshore lined with Wallmarts and lumber mills and Silicon Valley factories. It all hinges on Oysterville Sea Farms, they said.
While the opposition was narrow in their focus, Dan’s supporters covered a wide spectrum. The business community of Ocean Park was represented. Both port managers spoke. People involved in historic preservation spoke. Members of Dan’s immediate family spoke. They pointed out the positive impact Oysterville Sea Farms has had on tourism, on economic development, on adding to knowledge and understanding about our bay. Dan’s employees spoke about the very real impact of closing down his retail business is having on local job opportunities.
A scientist who has been studying the water quality of our bay for ten years spoke, and to me his testimony was the most telling of all. Basically, he said that there is nothing to save the bay from these days – the thriving communities and businesses that once added to our economy here are gone. Even the native species in the bay are gone. Our chances of maintaining and developing a sustainable economy have been severely curtailed over the years.
I’m sure others in the audience were left wondering whether the zealous protection of water quality in the bay has, in fact improved life for the rest of us. Or, have the self-interests of a few been supported for too long at the expense of the community at large?
And, in the end, what will the recommendation of the Planning Commission be? Will they, once again, go along with the few? Or will they see a larger picture this time and find a way for Oysterville Sea Farms to continue? And, can Dan hold out long enough for the decision to be made? We wonder and we worry…




