Archive for the ‘Rants and Raves’ Category

And the answer, my friends, is…

Tuesday, May 7th, 2013
Dinner Table Lilacs

Dinner Table Lilacs

I’ve always been a bit smug about apostrophes.  They came right after capitals and periods during all the years I taught primary grades.  The rules for using apostrophes are so simple that even second graders could master them.  So, I was absolutely flabbergasted to find that it was an apostrophe that caused my most recent cyberspace problems.

Day before yesterday I blogged about my friend Stephanie’s always-welcoming kitchen table and I had a gorgeous photograph of Saturday’s centerpiece of lilacs that I wanted to use to illustrate my blog.  No matter what I did, I could NOT get that photograph to load onto the wordpress blog site.

I turned the problem over to Keleigh Schwartz and beachdog.com.  They worked on it diligently and late yesterday came up with the answer.  I had named my jpg photograph “At Stephanie’s Table” and it was the apostrophe in the title that was fouling me up.  As instructed by my web gurus, I removed and renamed and… voilà!  I was able to add the photograph to my blog.

Today I’m going to use that very same photograph, now called “Dinner Table Lilacs,” so readers can see it without going back to the previous post.  And speaking of ‘previous,’ I did actually blog about the use of apostrophes on May 24th last year in a rant I titled “Apostrophes are Simple.  Really.”  In it I explained and illustrated these three rules:

Rule #1.  Do not use an apostrophe if you want to make a word plural.  Not ever.
Rule #2.  Do use an apostrophe when you write a contraction.
Rule #3.  Do use an apostrophe when you want to show possession.

Now, of course, there is Rule #4:  Do not use an apostrophe in the name of a photo.  At least, not if you are using whatever combination of tricky software programs that I am apparently hooked up with.  Who knew?

Over a Barrel while the Beat Goes On

Saturday, April 27th, 2013

I’ve gone on record many-a-time as being against exceeding the posted speed limit and I’ve taken a lot of flak for that from almost all of my nearest and dearest.  They say things like “you were a schoolteacher too long” or “everybody goes at least five miles over.”  But I remain adamant.

County BuildingEven after the crushing blow of being stopped last May for (yes!) going 40 in a 35 mph zone plus the further indignity of getting a ticket AND going to court, AND getting the ticket ‘forgiven’ but still having to pay $80 in court costs…  Yes, even after all of that, I continue to be adamant about following the speed limit and believing that those who ‘cheat’ by a few miles an hour are in the wrong.  Period.  (But I do get quite huffy about that short stretch on Sandridge where it’s 35, 25, 35, 45 and woe-be-unto-you if your attention wavers.)

It was my first ticket of any kind since 1978 – 34 years of a pristine and pure record.  So, when we got our auto insurance renewal yesterday and we found that our premium has gone up by $185.40 for the upcoming year to a figure in excess of $1,250 for each and every subsequent year until 2018, I was more than a little indignant.

It’s bad enough our insurance company no longer provides us with “personal” service.  There was once a time when our agent took us out to the Ark for dinner every now and then.  It was a PR thing, maybe on an expense account or maybe not.  I only know we enjoyed the attention and the conversation and, certainly, the meal.  And, when it came to our auto insurance, if we had a problem, he would go to bat for us.  I remember when someone T-boned our brand new car as we drove through Nahcotta.  “Don’t worry,” our agent said, “I’ll take care of everything.”  And he did.

Now, we don’t even have an ‘agent’ that I know of – just a series of menu options when we telephone and, eventually, a voice on the other end that tells us what the company policy is.  “Your driving record?  No, no credit for good driving.”  Over and out.

So… we’re shopping.  I think the days of individual attention are probably over.  But, I’m not giving up on getting credit for a good driving record.  And I’m not giving up on finding a less expensive premium.  And I’m probably not giving up whining about the entire process.

My Own Little Parallel Universe?

Friday, April 5th, 2013

Hunting Easter EggsI’ve always considered myself quite logical – perhaps more logical than most.  My husband often concedes that this is true, but he also points out now and then that my logic is sometimes not in line with the rest of the world’s.

Take, for instance, the second section of this week’s Chinook Observer.  Most of the first page of that section is devoted to color photographs by staff photographer Damian Mulinix.  This week they were Easter pictures and under the largest, the caption reads:  When the word was given it was quickly a mad egg scramble on the grounds of the Beach Barons field Saturday during the club’s annual Easter egg hunt.

Hunt?  Easter egg HUNT?  The eggs were lined up in plain sight on the lawn.  No hunting required.  Must have been one of those “fair for everybody” things.  Surely, some misguided party planner must have thought, ‘it wouldn’t be right to really hide the eggs so that only the most persistent and keenest of hunters might get the most.’  So it turns out that the grabbiest and greediest get the most and no one feels like they really met the challenge.  How very sad that we have come to such a pass.

I well remember the egg hunts of my childhood in St. Francis Wood in San Francisco.  I was one of the youngest cousins and I hardly ever got as many eggs as the older girls and boys.  But how excited and proud I was about the ones I did find!  It wasn’t a “just snatch as fast as you can” sort of game.  It took some work and when you were finished you felt a real sense of accomplishment over every egg you had managed to find.  Once I found a stuffed bunny, too!  I treasured him for years.

Meeting NoticeRight next to those disappointing and illogical pictures in the paper was this headline:  WellSpring hosting annual town hall gathering.  Good!  I shifted my attention to reading about a form of democracy that is near and dear to my heart.  I’m sure that my New England ancestors were gathering in town halls as early as the seventeenth century, coming together to become informed and to discuss the issues of the day.

But my logic button went totally berserk when I read about the WellSpring plan:  “Our focus is a little different this year…  We decided to invite a number of different community service, charitable and healthy-living focused organizations to be the center of the event said one of the town hall committee members.

The event will be organized like a fair with representatives sitting at tables handing out information.  There will even be carnival games and food.  But there was no mention of an open forum or opportunity for the public to exchange ideas.

How in the world does that describe a town hall meeting?  Unless I am living in a seriously parallel universe, WellSpring is hosting a fair.  Plain and Simple.  Not a town hall meeting where people can come together to discuss important issues.  Not a gathering where the point is to conduct serious discourse in a public setting.

What is wrong with this picture?  And this article?  Please oh please.  I hope it’s not just me!

Reaching Critical Mess

Wednesday, April 3rd, 2013

IMG_3274As I understand it, “critical mass” as a sociodynamic concept means a sufficient number of adopters of an innovation in a social system so that the rate of adoption becomes self-sustaining and creates further growth.  I think “critical mess” is more descriptive of what was happening here on the Peninsula yesterday, and I certainly hope it is far from self-sustaining and quickly dies from lack of interest.

The mess I am speaking about occurred on the sidewalk in front of Sid’s market.  A young man (maybe two) had set up a table and umbrella and were displaying some totally disrespectful posters of President Obama sporting a Hitler style mustache.  (Actually it had more of a Charlie Chaplin or Oliver Hardy look.) They were passing out information and advocating Obama’s impeachment.  Their sign said, “Both Parties Suck” and “It’s the Constitution, Stupid.”

543127_10152744052610602_201874390_nThat much I saw as Nyel and I drove by on our way to do a few errands.  I also saw a group of young women, all of whom I knew, who were across the street with picket signs.  One sign featured a pointing arrow with the words “Not from here.”  I empathized with their desire to distance themselves and all of the Peninsula from the unfortunate and disrespectful display across the way.

The rest of my information about this “Critical Mess” came from Face Book.  Apparently, the manager at Sid’s had called the sheriff and was told that since the petitioners were on the public right-of-way (i.e. the sidewalk) they were entitled to stay there.

How ironic and insulting that they chose to be in front of the late Senator Sid’s place of business.  Sid was not only an Obama supporter but was an icon of ‘respectful politics.’   As Governor Christine Gregoire said at his funeral a few short months ago,  “Sid was legendary for getting things done and for his never-failing courtesy and civility.  He represented his district and the people of our state with principle, dignity and modesty.”

While I certainly defend the right of free assembly and free speech and whatever  other guaranteed freedoms might be involved in yesterday’s display, it would be nice if those who feel compelled to be heard in this manner could at least be well-informed.  Perhaps then a righteous dialogue could take place.  I don’t think that name-calling and graffiti are quite what our founding fathers had in mind when they hammered out the Constitution.

But, in this case, perhaps the commentary by the inimitable Pat Schenk was best.  According to yet another Face Book entry, Pat arrived at the scene later in the afternoon with “an awesome neon sign that said ‘ignorant protesters ahead.’”  I wish I had seen that!  Way to go, Pat!

Insalata Caprese, Oysterville Style

Wednesday, March 27th, 2013

Insalata Caprese a la OystervilleMy introduction to Caprese salad came in the best place possible – on the Isle of Capri where, presumably, it was ‘invented.’  It was a good many years ago (more than fifty) but I remember the day and the excursion to the Blue Grotto and the salad with total clarity.  I’ve had the good fortune to return only once, but the azure water, the vistas from the ruins of Emperor Tiberius’s Villa Jovis all come back to me every time I see Insalata Caprese on a menu.

You’d think that with such an association of pleasant memories, I’d be making Caprese salad here at home fairly often, but for whatever reason that is not the case.  I think it has something to do with the infrequent availability of fresh basil at my usual marketing haunts.  But, it just happened that all the ingredients found their way into my shopping basket Monday and … voilà!  Or, as they would say on Capri… Ecco!  Yesterday for lunch I fixed the Oysterville version of Insalata Caprese.

Instead of slices of large ‘tennis balls’ of mozzarella interspersed with sliced (maybe beefsteak) tomatoes, mine was made with small cotton-ball sized mozzarella and cherry tomatoes, sliced and interspersed with the requisite basil.  The finishing touch was to toss it all with Nyel’s homemade oil and vinegar dressing and serve it cascading over avocado halves.  Voila!  Ecco!  To die for!  The best lunch ever.

I think we’ll have a repeat performance today.

Eighty-Six Daffodils Down!

Monday, March 25th, 2013

Daffodil BootyAs I backed the car out of the garage and turned south yesterday, we noticed a lot of activity in the church yard.  Two little girls, maybe in the seven or eight-year-old range were racing around the flower beds yanking up daffodils.  A boy, perhaps a year younger, galloped along beside them.  All were laughing and screaming in maniacal delight.

I hit the brakes.  Nyel hit the window button.

“What are you doing?” he called out.  The children didn’t miss a beat.  The kept grabbing the blossoms as shreds of stems and leaves scattered in their wake.

I was out my door and into the churchyard before the punctuation mark had been placed after Nyel’s question.  I was in full Incensed Teacher Mode.  In fact, I doubt very much if the kids I taught during those thirty-nine years ever saw me so angry.

“STOP!  RIGHT NOW!” And they did.  There was no mistaking my tone.  I turned to a woman just approaching the church.  “Are these children with you?”

She shook her head “no” and actually backed away from me.  I must have looked like the Mad Woman of Oysterville.

The children, meanwhile, were disappearing around the side of the church.

“GET BACK HERE!” I shouted.  Slowly they turned my way, waiting for an adult who suddenly appeared from behind the church,.

“Are you in charge of these children?”  Her response was an ever-so-slight nod accompanied by a deer-in-the-headlights kind of look.

“What on earth are you thinking?” I demanded.

“They were only taking them from behind the church,” she finally said.

“No, they weren’t.  I saw them right here in front.”

“Well, they were only supposed to pick the ones from the back.  Where it wouldn’t show…”

“Supposed to?!”  I remember only that I questioned her parenting ability, her concept of private property, mentioned stealing and vandalism and asked if she was prepared to pay for the flowers and the damage.  She uttered not a word in response, still looking  like a Bimbo Bambi.  By then, the children had gathered behind her, empty handed.

“Bring me the daffodils,” I said.  “All of them.”  They were retrieved from under the church where they had been stashed and reluctantly handed over.  Then the four of them got into their van (the little boy protesting, “Can’t we stay?  Do we have to go?) and off they drove.

And, thus it is that I have two giant vases filled with eighty-six somewhat tattered daffodils in my house.  After I had put them in water, we hurried on our way to the Columbia River Trio’s concert in Ilwaco.  Soothing as their music was, it took me well into the second half to calm down.

Déjà vu: 1959

Tuesday, March 19th, 2013

Cate's ArticleI should have known better than to answer the phone the other night.  I was working late on book proofs (well, late for me!) and none of our friends or loved ones EVER calls after nine o’clock.  It was no surprise when the man at the other end began the conversation, “You don’t know me, but…”

His voice was a little slurry, but pleasant, so I listened even though I was feeling pressed for time.  It turned out that he had read Cate Gable’s column about me and he called to tell me that I was wrong.  “There were many women working on the editorial side of Bay Area newspapers in the early 1960s,” he told me.

He knew that for a fact he said because he had been working for the San Jose Mercury at that time.  In fact, he told me, he had gotten his M.A. degree in Communications at Stanford in 1957, the same year I graduated from that institution with a B.A. in Journalism.  Somehow, he made “Communication” sound a bit more important than “Journalism.”  I began to feel tired.

The crux of his message was that the caption under my picture just wasn’t true.

(Note:  The caption said, Sydney Stevens graduated with a Stanford degree in journalism but no newspaper editorial room, even in the Bay Area, was ready to hire a woman in the ‘60s.)

“Well,” I said,”I can only tell you what my own experience was.”

“But women were being hired,” he said.  “That’s all there was to it.”

“So, are you saying it was just me that couldn’t get a newspaper job in 1959?”  He said that yes, that was the way he saw it.  By now I was feeling not only tired, but sick and tired.

In fact, as he talked, I began to realize that I was feeling exactly like I had all those years ago when well-spoken men condescendingly told me that there wasn’t a job available for me on their newspaper.  Mostly they said they just weren’t hiring.  Now, as then, I felt small.  Diminished.  Not worth much.  And this time, although he didn’t use the ‘L’ word, it was clear that I was being told I was untruthful.

Unlike fifty-some years ago, I got a little cross.  I talked back a bit.  I reiterated what my experiences had been as a young single mother with a useless degree from a fine university.

“That’s not what it said in the caption under your picture,” he said.  Apparently, he was taking umbrage that my experience had been generalized to apply to all women.

“Then perhaps you should talk to Cate,” I said.  “She wrote the caption.”  (Sorry, Cate! It just popped out!)

And then he said the most amazing thing of all.  “Oh no.  I think she is an excellent writer.”  I couldn’t agree more, but I’m not sure how that morphs into a telephone call to me about a caption under my picture that is (I think) a fair generalization from what I told Cate – a call to take me to task and to tell me that what I had gone through hadn’t happened.

In the end, he described his house of seventeen years and he said that he’d like to have me and my husband over to see it sometime.  It was a lot like the parting remarks of potential employers of 1959: “Be sure to check back with us soon.”  Yeah.  You betcha!

Ramona Quimby and Me

Monday, March 4th, 2013

RamonaAs I recall, I was a fairly compliant little girl. As an only child, I didn’t need to compete with siblings for attention and, though I can’t cite specific examples, I was probably spoiled – not in a material way because we never had any money.  But I don’t remember very many times that I needed to argue with the authority figures in my life in order to get my way.

So, years later, when I was teaching primary grades and reading to my classes from “chapter books” each day (that precious fifteen minutes after lunch that we all loved!), I managed to learn a lot from the characters of children’s literature.  One such individual was Beverly Cleary’s feisty Ramona Quimby.

I always think of her by the entire title of one of the books in which she starred, Ramona Quimby Age 8, though it is the Kindergarten-aged Ramona with whom I best identify, even now as I approach the octogenarian years!  Maybe I’m declining into those “second childhood years” or maybe, to put a more positive spin on it, I’m just in touch with the child in me.  Whatever… I feel that Ramona has taught me a great deal.

Take her Kindergarten habit of pointing at someone who annoyed her and drawing a huge X in the air in front of them.  It took a while for everyone to figure out what she was doing – X-ing them out of existence.  At school she was learning how to X out the picture that didn’t belong with the others – for instance, if she X-ed out the banana in a row of various toys on her worksheet, her teacher smiled and praised her.  So, she applied it to real-life situations.  In modern parlance, she was in effect letting people know that they were ‘out of her network!’

I love that!  Not that I actually point and make the X.  But, I do try to remember that there is no reason to worry about those annoying people who interfere unduly with my version of sanity.  I can just mentally X them out and get on with things.

The most important thing I learned from little Miss Ramona, though, was that sometimes it is useful to make a “Great Big Noisy Fuss.”  Granted, Ramona’s GBNFes were more in the form of tantrums and mine are (I hope) in the form of reasoned-but-firm objections to situations which I feel are unfair or just plain ridiculous.  Instead of rolling over and letting someone (who I am sure is wrong) prevail, I find that making a GBNF (in a nice way) is helpful.

And so it is thanks to Ramona-Quimby-Age-8 that I have gained a little time for correcting the proofs on my Legendary Locals book and the promise that I will, indeed, see a second set of proofs before it goes to press. Thanks for that trick, Ramona-Quimby-Age-8!  Once again you have proved to be the perfect role model!

More Than a Phase

Tuesday, January 29th, 2013

Landscape Turned RedSince seeing the movie, “Lincoln,” we have been on a Civil War (Nyel) and Lincoln (me) reading marathon.  I can’t help but wonder how many other people who saw the film were also prompted to learn more about our sixteenth president and/or the war that dominated his years in office.

For us, neither subject is a new interest.  Nyel has always been fascinated by the strategies and battles of war.  Since our visits to Gettysburg and other such sites some years back and then seeing Ken Burns’ Civil War series, he has read a number of books about that particular war.  As for me, I consider my interest in Abraham Lincoln almost genetic.

Lincoln CornerMy grandparents were avid Lincoln fans as were my parents.  There is even a corner of our library devoted to Lincoln – not a shrine exactly, but close.  It includes a copy of the deed to this property signed by Lincoln, a photograph of the Lincoln Memorial, a dozen or so books about him, and a plaster bust of his head.  Ironically, the bust has been broken at the back – shades of the gunshot wound that killed him?

What impressed me most about Daniel Day Lewis’s portrayal of Lincoln in the movie was the way it clarified Lincoln’s use of folksy humor and storytelling to make his point or to deflect the opposition.  We have all read that this was one of Lincoln’s strong characteristics, but the how of it was never really clear to me until the movie.

Rise to GreatnessSo often books about Lincoln explain the ‘why’ of his greatness, but the gentle force of his wit is harder to make clear.  If I were awarding the Oscars, Lewis would win best actor for that aspect of his portrayal, alone.  But… I digress.

I loved the movie and love that it prompted further reading – not only about Lincoln and the Civil War, but about the times of a century-and-a-half ago when our nation was still forming and Oysterville was brand new.  As always, I am reminded that some things don’t change – at least not as much as we’d like.

Overwhelmed By It All

Tuesday, January 15th, 2013

As I was reading the email from my webmaster this morning and came to the sentence that began The synoptic answer, in terms of organic results, I’m pretty sure my eyes crossed.  I might even have lost consciousness for a nanosecond.  Whatever happened “in terms of organic results” was that my brain turned off and I suffered from immediate overwhelmsion.

The topic under ‘discussion’ was my blog – this very blog – and why it no longer interfaces directly to Facebook.  Bottom line (I think), no one knows the answer to “why?”  It just doesn’t and hasn’t since mid-December.  Probably Facebook is to blame.

What that means for me is that my readership is falling away and the question before me is:  should I continue with the blog?   I’m pretty sure that Oysterville Day Book blog fans will say “no” and I very much appreciate that sentiment,  but I’m trying to keep my sights set on why I began blogging in the first place, and even more to the point, why I arranged to have the blog go directly to Facebook.

It was all meant to raise my profile and, hopefully, to increase awareness of me as an author.  Presumably, if people enjoyed my blog, then checked out my website and saw that I had written books, they might even buy some.  Though it’s all very hard to quantify, I do think that scenario has occurred to some degree.  But now… the emphasis is changing.

So, I’m left examining some very hard questions.  Do I enjoy blogging for its own sake?  Or is it the contacts I’ve met through the blog that bring me pleasure?  Am I feeling obligated to continue?  Could I use my time more productively?  Just what is “the synoptic answer” anyway?