Archive for the ‘From the Past’ Category

Comparative Cultures 101

Wednesday, May 8th, 2013
At Jorvik

At Jorvik

Yesterday, two totally unrelated events converged and seguéd in my mind into a grand and impossible fantasy.  First was the arrival (several weeks after it was sent) of a postcard from members of the Mystery Book Club who were on a visit to England.  Second was a visit to Middle Village/Station Camp at McGowan – a ‘field trip’ with the visiting Cuzzins.

A month or so ago, as the book club (in which I was a founding member and a founding drop-out) were preparing a long anticipated trip to the UK, they mentioned that York was on their itinerary and Nyel and I said (as you do to friends off on an enviable adventure), “Try to visit the Jorvik Center while you were there.

That’s over-simplifying, of course, because we couldn’t think of what the place was called – only that it was a Viking “experience” – sort of a historic Disney ride which was created back in the 1970s on the site of an archaeological dig.  We had visited there in the mid-1990s and had a clear memory of the place, if not its name.

The Jorvik center came about when a factory in downtown York was demolished and excavations to the site by the York Archaeological Trust revealed the well-preserved remains of the timber buildings of the Viking city of Jorvik.  In addition, workshops, fences, animal pens, privies, pits and well were discovered, along with durable materials and artifacts such as pottery, metalwork and bones – even wood, leather, textiles and plant remains.  All in all, over 40,000 objects were recovered dating from about 900 AD.

After recovery of the artifacts, the Trust excavated part of Jorvik on the site, and brought the Viking village ‘back to life’ with sights, sounds, smells (including those of pigsties, latrines and a pigsty) and moving figures through innovative interpretive methods.  All of it has lingered in my mind as a real-life Disneyland ride back through time.

At Middle Village-Station Camp

At Middle Village/Station Camp

No sooner had the postcard picturing one of the animated ‘workers’ at Jorvik arrived, than we took Cheryl and Virg to the newest of the National Parks’ Lewis and Clark sites along the river.  To compare the two experiences is hardly fair but I just couldn’t help it.  How wonderful it would be if ‘our’ Middle Village/Station Camp site could be interpreted by really ‘taking’ visitors on a trip back in time!

The missing ingredient to that fantasy, of course, is money – ten or twenty million dollars, or maybe more, judging by the reported investment the York National Trust made to recreate and interpret the Jorvik site.  Even so, our conclusion at the end of our visit to Middle Village/Station Camp was that the interpretive signage could have been much, much better.  At the very least, the information (even as limited and repetitive as it was) could have been better written and less biased.

Oh well…

Letting in the Sunshine

Tuesday, April 23rd, 2013

Letting in the SunshineThe window crew worked at Tucker and Carol’s from early to late yesterday.  They are preparing to install the windows.  Whoo Hoo!  Progress by leaps and bounds!

I only caught one glimpse of Tucker – on his way over to daughter Lina’s to eat lunch, I think.  Otherwise, I believe he is still in Paint Mode, getting the last of the windows ready for final placement.  Even so, I’m sure anticipation is high.

Though it has been nearly 35 years since my little house on the bay was at the same point, I well remember how excited I was when the windows finally went in.  Builder Ossie Steiner and I had gone to Hillsdale, Oregon months beforehand to order those windows.

As he was with every single aspect of building, Ossie was meticulous in the matter of windows and felt that a sash and door company in Hillsdale, Oregon offered the best product, made with the best materials.  We talked at length with the owner of the company, especially with regard to our coastal weather and our ‘sideways rain.’  He assured us that they were well-experienced in those matters.

1979 Bay HouseUnfortunately, it turned out otherwise.  During our first big storm of the season, in November 1979, a number of the windows failed.  When Ossie took them apart to see what he could do to remedy the situation, he discovered that they had wicked water because they had not been caulked, among other things!

I wrote a long letter to the owner of the company, enclosing numerous photographs.  (Later, he told me that it was the best letter of complaint that he had ever read – for whatever that was worth!)  He and his head window guy came to the beach and did an inspection and, ultimately, replaced every single window.  Plus they gave me a considerable discount for my “trouble.”  Despite my window troubles, I give them high marks for honesty and integrity!Sunrise at the Bay House 1980

But, I remember that window experience all too well.  I do so hope that the windows going in at Tucker’s and Carol’s don’t suffer a similar fate.  May they always (and only!) let the sunshine in!  Starlight, too!  And, of course, provide a gazillion vistas of our beloved Oysterville.

Of Cemeteries, Prisons, and Friends

Friday, April 12th, 2013

Oysterville Cemetry SketchesOne of the most useful references I have relative to the history of Oysterville is a book called Oysterville Cemetery Sketches.  It was written in 1988 by Marie Oesting and is, essentially, a collection of memories by (then) old-timers about the people buried up on Davis Hill.  The illustrations are by Larry Weathers –simple line drawings of the gravestones in the pioneer section of the graveyard.

Marie gathered the stories, arranged the book’s format, and self-published it.  In nothing flat, or so it seemed, it sold out and became a collector’s item.  When she moved from away from the Peninsula a few years later, she turned over the manuscript to the Oysterville Cemetery Association.  We have managed to get it back into print once (an expensive proposition, as it turned out) and, again, it sold out almost immediately. Perhaps, someday, through the munificence of a cemetery benefactor, we can publish it again.

Rowena Oesting as Elizabeth FryLast evening we had occasion to see Marie once more.  She lives in southern California now and is known by the name ‘Roena.’  We saw her at Clatsop Community College where she was doing a one-woman performance:  “Prison Reform Work Then (and now?) A Visit With Elizabeth Fry: 1780-1845.”

Roena is a Friend, or as I am more likely to think of her, a Quaker.  According to the little brochure she handed out last night:  I am a member of the LaJolla Monthly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers).  My meeting has recognized this program as a leading for me and has issued a Travel Minute in support.”  In carrying out her leading or mission, Roena travels, performing and talking about prison reform work.

It was a lovely performance and educational, as well.  Before she began, Roena asked various audience members if they would participate by reading a short script.  My part was to be a representative of the British Ladies’ Association and to read a list of the supplies they provided to women prisoners bound for Australia.

Rowena Oesting in PerformanceThe journey was long, difficult and boring and, until the British Ladies Association became involved, upon arrival in the women had nothing — no money, no contacts, no prospects.  The British Ladies Association taught the women to quilt so that they would have an occupation during the voyage and a product to sell or barter once they arrived.

Roena is staying here in Oysterville with our neighbor and her good friend, Sue Holway.  We hope that we will have a chance to visit with her before she is off to her next performance.  I want an opportunity to tell her how, once again, she has enriched my life by bringing stories of the past to the fore.

Front is Back in Oysterville

Wednesday, April 10th, 2013

Our HouseWe hardly ever step foot onto or off of our east porch.  Certainly not in the winter.  It leads directly onto a vast expanse of lawn.  No paving stones or pathway through the garden.  Just grass which seems always wet in winter and always in need of mowing the rest of the year.  It is, to all intents and purposes, our ‘back porch.’

Nevertheless, even though it is seldom used, the porch has been in great need of replacement in recent years.  The decking first developed old-age cracks, then gaps, and then it began looking snaggle-toothed around the edges.  I thought that we’d have to cordon it off with yellow tape.East Porch, March 2013

When the porch troubles first began someone told us that the entire structure – posts, railings and all – would have to be replaced.  The railings involve intricate, handmade gingerbread and ever since that pronouncement, the dollar signs fairly dance across the porch each time I look at it.

Unfortunately, even though it is seldom used these days, that east porch is an important architectural element to the house, for it is in reality the front porch.  Like most houses constructed in Oysterville in the 1800s, ours was built facing the bay – central to all of the village activity in those early days when the only way into or out of the area was by water.

‘Roads,’ such as they were, developed gradually and, until automobiles began showing up in the 1920s, they were sandy (or muddy, depending on the weather) rutted wagon routes that led to the farthest farms but not beyond.  Our house, like everyone’s, had a ‘back entrance’ on the west where firewood was dropped off and another on the south where tradesmen and farmhands came on errands.  But it was the east door that was the main entrance to the house.

Originally, there had been three more streets between the house and the bay but by the time of my mother’s childhood they were fading into obscurity.  Behind the house, Fourth Street, now known as Territory Road, East Porch, April 2013became the main thoroughfare and our erstwhile back door became the front.  When my folks retired here in the early 1970s, one of mom’s childhood friends came to call and mom was so touched that she came to the old front door – the only person, mom said, who remembered.

These days the importance of that front porch is not so much as an entry point, but as a backdrop in photographs.  It’s one of the building’s distinctive features and I am delighted to report that it is being repaired.  The earlier “all or nothing” prediction, which we could ill afford, turned out to be untrue and, though the day will undoubtedly come that we have to face the prospect of recreating that gingerbread, for now it’s simply new decking in progress.  Hooray!

Dale’s Easter Bonnet

Monday, April 1st, 2013

Dale's HatMy mother, Dale Espy Little, was known for her hats.  For the reception after her 2009 memorial service, I decorated our porch with all the hats that she had left behind and invited the women who had come to her “goodbye” to take one/

Her favorite hat during her later years at the nursing home was a saucy pink number.  She wore it a lot and I have photographs of her on many special occasions wearing that hat.  I was especially pleased that one of her most devoted caregivers during that period, Barbara Christian, selected that hat the day of the service.July 1, 2009

Yesterday I received this Easter note from Barbara:  Sydney, since acquiring your mother’s hat I have gotten a lot of mileage from it. Today it visited Easter coffee hour at St Peters. Kaye Cowan and I thought you may like to see the Easter Bonnet so here are a few photos. –Barbara Christian

It was the perfect Easter gift!  And,wouldn’t my mom have loved seeing her hat used in this imaginative way!   Thank you so much, Barbara.  (And, Kaye, too!)At OVCC, Mother's Day May 13, 2006Sleeping Mom With Hat June 2006October 2006

Namesakes and Family Skeletons

Saturday, March 23rd, 2013

Richardson ChildrenEven though I was named after my great uncle, Sidney Richardson, I don’t know much about him.  I think that’s because his older sister (my Grandmother Espy) considered him a bit of a failure and, too, he was a shadowy figure in the background of one of our family skeletons.

Sid, as he was always called, was one of those young men who couldn’t seem to find his calling.  My grandmother, three years the elder, worried about him.  I know this from her early (1897/1898) letters to my grandfather when they were courting.  She was concerned that Sid was not interested in school and didn’t seem to know what he wanted to do in life.

That uncertainty followed him even after he was grown and married.  For a while in the nineteen teens and twenties, he and his wife Beulah lived here in Oysterville and he tried his hand at growing cranberries.  My mother and her siblings remembered him as a “kind and interested” uncle – no outstanding or unusual characteristics.

That’s how I remember him, too.  By the time I came along, Uncle Sid and Aunt Bu were living in Medford.  They had a small commercial pear orchard and Aunt Bu ran the local humane society.  We always stopped at their place on our way back and forth from California to Oysterville, although the visits ended when Uncle Sid died in 1948.

Nevertheless, I’ve always felt there was a side to Uncle Sid that he had buried away – a tragedy that no one talked about until well after my grandmother’s death in 1954.  The story had to do with a love triangle involving my grandmother’s best friend Eva Gaches.

Eva, apparently, was one of those charismatic women that Victorian men pined after.  Among the ‘piners’ were both Daniel Richardson (Helen and Sid’s father) and young Sid – one too old for Eva (and never mind that he was married) and the other, too young (just an impressionable teenager.)  As it happened, Eva and her brother (who were from Port Townsend, Washington) were boarding with the Richardsons while they attended California College in East Oakland.  This arrangement apparently led to some hanky-panky between Dan and the desirable Eva.

When Annie Medora Richardson, Dan’s wife (and mother of Helen, Sid, and their younger sister Ruth) died in 1902, he waited only a short time before marrying the lovely Eva.  One of the enduring family stories is that, on her deathbed Annie told daughter Helen,  “Make sure that I am buried wearing my wedding ring,  That girl downstairs may have Dan, but she can’t have that.”

Although My grandmother and Eva remained friendly for the rest of their lives, their relationship was never again close as it had been in their youth.  And though Dan and Eva had a son, Dan, Jr., (who was about the age of my uncle Edwin, Helen’s fifth child), his relationship to the family always seemed distant.   After all, he was of an age to be a son and cousin, but was a half-brother and half-uncle, instead.

As for Sid, I always heard that he left home heartbroken, never to return.  I don’t think that is quite true because somewhere we have a picture of a family gathering which includes Sid and Bu along with Eva and Dan.

I wonder, sometimes, why my folks chose to name me after Uncle Sid.  I was always told that, if a boy, I was to be Sidney but since I was a girl, the name was spelled with a ‘y.’  I can only think that it was the name they fancied.  If it was to honor Uncle Sid, himself, I wish they’d mentioned why.

Déjà vu: 1959

Tuesday, March 19th, 2013

Cate's ArticleI should have known better than to answer the phone the other night.  I was working late on book proofs (well, late for me!) and none of our friends or loved ones EVER calls after nine o’clock.  It was no surprise when the man at the other end began the conversation, “You don’t know me, but…”

His voice was a little slurry, but pleasant, so I listened even though I was feeling pressed for time.  It turned out that he had read Cate Gable’s column about me and he called to tell me that I was wrong.  “There were many women working on the editorial side of Bay Area newspapers in the early 1960s,” he told me.

He knew that for a fact he said because he had been working for the San Jose Mercury at that time.  In fact, he told me, he had gotten his M.A. degree in Communications at Stanford in 1957, the same year I graduated from that institution with a B.A. in Journalism.  Somehow, he made “Communication” sound a bit more important than “Journalism.”  I began to feel tired.

The crux of his message was that the caption under my picture just wasn’t true.

(Note:  The caption said, Sydney Stevens graduated with a Stanford degree in journalism but no newspaper editorial room, even in the Bay Area, was ready to hire a woman in the ‘60s.)

“Well,” I said,”I can only tell you what my own experience was.”

“But women were being hired,” he said.  “That’s all there was to it.”

“So, are you saying it was just me that couldn’t get a newspaper job in 1959?”  He said that yes, that was the way he saw it.  By now I was feeling not only tired, but sick and tired.

In fact, as he talked, I began to realize that I was feeling exactly like I had all those years ago when well-spoken men condescendingly told me that there wasn’t a job available for me on their newspaper.  Mostly they said they just weren’t hiring.  Now, as then, I felt small.  Diminished.  Not worth much.  And this time, although he didn’t use the ‘L’ word, it was clear that I was being told I was untruthful.

Unlike fifty-some years ago, I got a little cross.  I talked back a bit.  I reiterated what my experiences had been as a young single mother with a useless degree from a fine university.

“That’s not what it said in the caption under your picture,” he said.  Apparently, he was taking umbrage that my experience had been generalized to apply to all women.

“Then perhaps you should talk to Cate,” I said.  “She wrote the caption.”  (Sorry, Cate! It just popped out!)

And then he said the most amazing thing of all.  “Oh no.  I think she is an excellent writer.”  I couldn’t agree more, but I’m not sure how that morphs into a telephone call to me about a caption under my picture that is (I think) a fair generalization from what I told Cate – a call to take me to task and to tell me that what I had gone through hadn’t happened.

In the end, he described his house of seventeen years and he said that he’d like to have me and my husband over to see it sometime.  It was a lot like the parting remarks of potential employers of 1959: “Be sure to check back with us soon.”  Yeah.  You betcha!

Mrs. Bridget Tanger: Old Oysterville’s Irish Washerwoman

Sunday, March 17th, 2013

St. Patrick's Window at Oysterville StoreEarlier this week a big, green, old-fashioned parcel post scale appeared in the west window of the Oysterville Store.  Surrounding it are several leprechaun-ish looking creatures and sitting directly on top, weighing in, is a tiny, wooly lamb.

My immediate thought when I saw it was “Happy Saint Patrick’s Day,” but the more I looked, the more I thought that if I thought about it (got that?) the display might be heavy with symbolism.  I also wondered if it was a scale used by Minnie Andrews when she was postmaster.  It is a 1925 model which would be just about right.  Minnie was in charge of Oysterville’s mail from 1918 to 1945.

Mostly, though, the display made me think about the story of Bridget Tanger, the only Irish resident of Oysterville that I know anything about.  Bridget came to the United States from County Mayo, Ireland, with her husband Carl.  They lived first in Illinois, and then came to Oysterville, Washington Territory where Carl found work in the oyster industry.  They lived in Diamond City at the north end of Long Island but had taken out a claim on the Naselle River.

On January 1, 1873, when Carl was 44 years old, he and his friend, Julius Mac, left Oysterville for Naselle towing a raft of lumber and other materials for the home he was so eagerly planning.  As they were crossing the bay, a sudden squall wrecked the boat and both men were drowned.  His body came ashore just a few feet from his family’s home at Diamond City.

Years later his daughter Ella (who was five at the time of the drowning) wrote this in her diary:  My earliest recollections are of our trip across the stormy bay the day of my father’s funeral.  There were the two caskets in one boat, and the rest of us in the other.  Father’s body was the first buried in Oysterville Cemetery; he and Julius Mac share a common grave.  (I’m not totally sure about Ella’s facts here.  There is a gravestone in the Captain Stream plot which says simply, “Our Baby 7/21/1870.”  Perhaps the remains were moved from somewhere else at a later time?)

After the tragedy, Bridget moved to Oysterville where the people took up a subscription and built her a house at the south end of town near Andrew Wirt’s place and across the street from Ned Osborne’s home.  Her fifth child was born eight months after Carl’s drowning and, to support her family, she took in washing.  Her specialty was the white, stiff-bosomed shirts worn by the men working at the nearby Court House.  Bleached snowy white, starched, ironed and delivered – twenty-five cents each!

A few years later, Bridget married Marshall Soames and they homesteaded on the Wallicut.  The four older children rowed three miles down a slough each day to a one-room school and they were gone from eight in the morning until four in the afternoon.  Asked if she didn’t worry, given the fate of their father, Bridget’s answer was always:  If they’re born to be hung, they’ll never be drowned.”

            According to Bridget’s granddaughter, Eleanor Barrows Bower, who wrote up her grandmother’s story for the Spring 1968 Sou’wester magazine, all of Bridget’s children grew to maturity and led prosperous, productive lives.  None drowned and none were hanged.

“The Seven Wives of Josiah Crouch”

Tuesday, March 5th, 2013

Oysterville Baptist Church 1903When I asked Cuzzin Ralph to do a little research about Josiah Crouch, I had no idea that I would be presented with the seeds of another book… maybe.  It all came about because of an ongoing discussion I’ve been having with singer/songwriter Larry Murante.

Some years ago, Larry wrote a wonderful ballad about the ghost who hangs around our house – the house that used to be a parsonage.  Her name is Mrs. Sarah Crouch.  In Larry’s song, she is the third wife of an early Baptist preacher here in Oysterville, the not-so-righteous Josiah Crouch.

Sarah drowned under rather mysterious circumstances on the Willapa River in July 1893.  Though marks were found on her neck, it was decided that they were inconclusive and Josiah was not arrested.  He left town shortly afterwards, however… with another man’s wife.  But, I digress.

The following November a letter arrived at the Oysterville Post Office from Topeka, Kansas.  It began …I am the ferst [sic] wife of one Josiah Crouch.  I was married to him the 5 day of August in 1885 at St. Joseph, Mo. County Buccanan [sic].  In 1888 he left me at Havensville Kans and I understand that he went to Ark. In 1889 he married a woman by the name of Tedden at Gladstone Ark as I had too [sic] letters from D. P. Tedden the father of his last wife.  I have a little girl 7 years old.  It was signed Tillie Crouch.

My discussion with Larry revolves around that letter.  His interpretation is that Tillie was Josiah’s first wife, that the Tedden woman was the second, and that Sarah Crouch was the third.  I wrote Cuzzin Ralph (a research wizard to my way of thinking) to see if he could find out what Sarah’s maiden name was.  And voilà!! It was Tedden!  But that was only part of what Ralph found out!

Josiah Crouch continued marrying.  By the time of his death in 1942, he had been wed seven times!  He had also been defrocked from the ministry, had become an attorney but was disbarred for committing a felony and who knows what else.  The obvious question, of course:  what happened to his other wives?  Did any of them, besides our Sarah, die prematurely and under mysterious circumstances?  Were there ever any divorces recorded or was he a bigamist from the get-go?

I think there may be a book here, or maybe several!  To say nothing of another song or two!  Stay tuned…as they say.

Visiting beyond the Porch

Friday, February 22nd, 2013

Greg's HouseJPGYesterday morning I went calling on our new neighbor Greg Rogers.  I had an appointment to interview him for a Chinook Observer article on his plans for the Oysterville Store.  We met at his house – the place we all call the Bert and Minnie Andrews House.

No one is completely sure when or where the house was built.  According to Bud Goulter, who seems to always know about these things, the house was once situated on Andrews property across from the John Crellin house, now often called “the bottle house.”  In the early 1900s Tom Andrews owned the Crellin house and the large Andrews family owned much of the property across the street.  Bert was Tom’s nephew.

Bert Andrews HouseAlso, according to Bud, the building was moved to its current location in 1907, although Bert and Minnie didn’t move into it until 1919.  All that is a little murky in the Facts Department.  Although Bert and Minnie and their five children are listed in the Oysterville Census of 1920, they are not listed in the 1910 census.  So perhaps they were not the owners of the house in 1907?

On the other hand, though they came from California, their four youngest children (the oldest of whom was 12 in 1920) were born in Washington.  So, if Oysterville was their birthplace, the family could have been here in 1907 or 1908.  Why they would move the house to a new location but not move there, themselves, is a bit of a puzzle.

Bert and Minnie Andrews(An aside – Tom Andrews’ brother, Sam, was the Oysterville postmaster from July 23, 1895 until his brother Tom replaced him on May 4, 1901.  In 1913, Sam took over again and then in July 1918 their niece-in-law, Minnie Andrews, became postmistress.  According to Charlotte Jacobs, an Andrews descendent, the issue was probably not one of nepotism but more a question of who could be talked into taking on the job. A case in point is when Tom Andrews was eager to move away from the peninsula.  Taking his postal responsibilities seriously, he felt he could not leave Oysterville before finding a replacement postmaster and talked brother Sam into serving a second time.  It apparently took Sam another five years to talk Minnie into taking her turn.  By the time Minnie retired on July 1, 1945, the Andrews family had collected and distributed mail for the residents of Oysterville for fifty years less twenty-one days.  An admirable record!)

Nevertheless, everyone seems to agree that Bert and Minnie moved into the house now owned by Greg at the same time that they built the store and post office.  In the earliest pictures of the house, it looks much the same as now – not many changes to the outside.  The inside, though is a different story.

Greg has been busy removing carpeting and old linoleum, tearing out non-original partitions and gradually getting down to the bones of the buildings.  There have been numbers of owners since the Andrews – The Wrights, the Stahlkes, the Munseys, the Smiths and maybe some I’ve forgotten.  Each family apparently put their particular stamp on the original.

Interestingly, there are few Oysterville residents who remember being inside the house since back in the 1950s or ‘60s.  I don’t think I was ever actually inside, even as a child – only on the big front porch back when the Wrights were the owners.  They had a player piano that they kept there and I remember how much fun it was to watch the keys go up and down as it played “Glow Little Glow Worm” and we sang along for all we were worth – a forerunner to today’s karaoke?

Greg and I did talk about his plans for the store which was, after all, our original intent.  We even went next door so I could take a look.  But I think I’ll have to do a follow-up interview if for no other reason than to see more of the inside of the house.  Such a treat after all these years of wondering what was beyond the porch!